To conclude our analysis of the No Child Left Behind program, we'll take a look at how the program is fundamentally flawed, even if it were properly funded. But first, we'll look at how the education system works here in the US of A. Traditionally, education funding starts at the state not the Federal level, and monies collected from city ordinances are used to build new schools, and make sure they're running par excellence. (This is, of course, the system in a nut shell) The Federal Government, traditionally, has little involvement with the education system.
So why is the Federal Government getting involved now?
As we discussed earlier, our schools are in pretty bad shape as a nation. And this is where NCLB comes in, brought to you by Rod Paige, the same man whom masterminded the Huston Miracle! As you can see, we're already off to such a wonderful start. We've already discussed the "plan" from the Federal Government, but here it is, again in a nut shell - Standardized National testing (the multiple choice type); those schools who perform the best get the most moo-la from the Federal Government.
Good! Doesn't that just hold the districts accountable?
Before we get to "who's accountable", first we need to see if this test thing is really the best means to achieve this. First, for most white collar jobs, the most important job skill you can have is the ability to communicate, either orally or written, your ideas succinctly and clearly. Remember all of those book reports and ten page essays-with-oral-presentations you had to do in high school? You can thank your teachers later. Remember our earlier statistic- that 60%-70% of high school graduates cannot think or read critically? NCLB does nothing to improve communication skills. The only thing a standardized test can determine is how well you can regurgitate factual information. (I do understand the importance of association, however) Our next generation will be released into the toughest job market the US has ever seen- not just competing with their neighbor for a good paying job, but the whole world, without proper communication skills.
So what can we do?
First we have to get to the root of the problem. I understand that there are some really bad teachers out there; however, how can a teacher teach a class when the students just wont behave? And if the teacher should try to take corrective action towards the unruly brat- Law suite! It looks like the root lies with the parents and trickles upwards into the hollowed halls of institutions of education. In my AFA post, I outlined some things parents can do to teach their children healthy study habits, but do the parents really have the time? Gone are the days when one parent can afford to stay home with the rug-rats and engaged in active parenting. We've exported a high majority of our higher paying manufacturing jobs over-seas, and there is so much competition for the jobs that are left, that it is causing heavy deflationary pressures on wadges. The job that payed $20.00 an hour twenty years ago now only pays $10.00 (salary adjusted in today's dollars). GDP (how much we produced inside the US) was at 1.3% for 2005, down from its average of 3.5% annual gain, (GDP hasn't been this low since depression times) while CPI (inflation) rose 3.4% in 2005. http://www.bls.gov/
What the heck does that mean?
That means the average price of goods has risen more than what we made (GDP is in $'s) domestically last year. Combine that with a high influx of illegal immigrants pushing wadges down, and it puts an ever increasing strain on the median family income. Parents to day, to survive, have to work more hours to generate the same amount of income they did a generation ago.
So with the parents unable to parent, who can we hold accountable? For now, I will only suggest that we need to reconsider our current structure of "corporate anarchy". Isn't it time we start pulling in the reigns, and incenting business to stay here in the united states?
Cody Hobbs
Friday, February 24, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
Seems you finally picked a topic no one can urge against Cody, good job.
No,...I Just don't care.
Maybe next time people should vote in favor of school vouchers.
~Virginia
I agree with Virginia, I just dont care about schools anymore...I might have cared when I was in school but not now.
~K
I care about schools for the simple fact I hate morons and don't look forward to the future when people just don't care about the proper education of the children. Cody makes a very easy, very clear cut point and because he makes it nearly arguement proof, you people just don't care. It's point blank stupid to just not care about the future, and you two who just don't care disgust me to a level I never knew I had, the sad thing is I call one of you friend.
Well, i can't speak for the K guy, but I don't care because I thought this blog was supposed to be about NON PARTISAN politics. All I see is left wing propaganda. I want to know what the other side has to say for themselves. There's another side to the story, but everytime I read this blog all I see is what the left has to say on such matters, I was hoping to find variety here because of the non partisanism that was preached, and the moderate voice for a young generation, but I don't see anything close to being moderate, and I'm not seeing both sides of the arguement. I guess what I was trying to say by I don't care isn't so much that I don't care about the state of the schools, I just don't care about the argument that's being brought up about what's happening to them.
~Virginia
Virginia,
It is just that apathetic line of thought that is tearing apart this nation. Conservatives are so concerned with legislating what people do in their bedrooms, watch on T.V. and what books shouldn't be read in school; yet they have no problem allowing corporations run as they pleas, because they are still trying to sell this lye that the economy is fully self regulating- when in fact it just does not. And FDR recognized this fact and raised the country out of its desperation's times by realizing that economically, there is need for intervention.
Most of us want to have a good job, the ability to support ourselves and maintain our families, yet are oblivious that the economic situations around us directly affect what options are open to us in our own lives. We also do not realize that our actions affects other peoples options too.
You can agree with my point of view, or you can disagree with it, however, to say you just don't care is simply disgusting, immature, and down right irresponsible.
To conclude my rant, you can't have your cake and eat it too. If a "laisser faire" economy works for you, then by all means, support it. If you, like myself, think the contrary, then support that. But to simply say "I don't care" is selling yourselves, and those around you, into slavery. And as I said before, we all have an effect on one another...
Cody Hobbs
One final word, and I won't get too deeply into it here, but school vouchers would be about the worst thing we could do to public schools. Vouchers would only make concrete the idea that the USA runs on a strict cast system- it would be the death of equality. I will expand on that though in a future post.
Cody Hobbs
Virginia,
We all have a point of view, and it would be contradictory to truth for me to promote ideals that I find reprehensible. I have come to my conclusions based on solid reasoning, NOT because I prescribe to the dogmatic principles of one party or the other. I do try to present the facts in a reasonable way. And if there is anything that I have omitted- pleas let me know. But tossing out a vague comment doesn't do any good.
What specifically have I left out that would erase all of the wrongs of No Child Left Behind? (Agreed upon bi-partisan by the way- Ted Kennedy-THE most liberal senator on the floor-helped to draft a version of the bill to be sent to the senate floor. So to say that I am simply taking the side of leftest propaganda is simply absurd!)
Cody Hobbs
Well here's my deal with what you wrote - it's not that I think that the No Child Left Behind thing was a good idea. I don't, I think it was a stupid idea to begin with; but my problem is that you say why you don't like it (you do it with everything), and then you knock it to hell, and I have no problem with that, but you're only representing one side, I'm not saying advocate something you don't believe in, but tell us what your opposers say and tell us why they're wrong.
And like I said before, I wasn't saying I don't care about the schools, I was saying I don't care what you were saying about them. You didn't say anything that anybody didn't already know. But what is the defense? And where is your moderate voice, not to be insulting, but there is nothing moderate about you.
~Virginia
Virginia,
What story am I missing? I tried to give a through history of the program, past to present. If there's something I'm missing (specific and factual), let me know what it is. And again, I can only write my conscious; I have never, in this blog, taken a side to an argument just to be on the "liberal" side of it.
Cody
I also am willing to concede when I am wrong. And in case it wasn't clear the first time, I now think that I was in the wrong in the AFA article. You were absolutely correct, Virginia, violent, sexually explicit, and otherwise morally degrading television programing does exacerbate the situation in the real world; and lines do need to be drawn in a clear fashion.
Cody Hobbs
What do the wonderful creators of the No Child Left Behind program have to say for their defense? That's all I'm asking. What I'm trying to get out is what do they think of what they have done?
~Virginia
Post a Comment